Does anyone have any advice on version numbers? Is there a rule of thumb to figure out what constitutes a 0.x release? Do others not even bothering numbering their model versions?
-
On Twitter
- Finally posted a #gist for efficient #MonteCarlo sampling in #Rstats https://t.co/njlHuxTi 2012/02/03
- After the longest review process ever, our #Biomass and #Bioenergy paper is finally published http://t.co/fqhohTiH 2012/02/03
- This is some sort of typographic voodoo... http://t.co/MhE0dTx9 #chartwell #typography 2012/01/26
- RT @kjhealy: Like physics, economic science reveals fundamental laws of nature and advises policymakers objectively and neutrally. #wiki ... 2012/01/18
Archives
One Comment
Glad that you find my blog useful and start yours as well!
By the way, as far as I understand the number above decimal point is official releases, b for beta is stable, but not offical release, and a for alpha is unstable release. But, it is really depends on personality. I know a few projects never get to the point of 1.0. Also, decimal points can be anything according to the current TeX version, i.e. 3.1415926535897932846